Lost and Found: A Mixed-Methods Examination of Identity in New Motherhood and Its Relation to the Developing Mother–Child Relationship

The transition to motherhood is widely recognized as a major developmental turning point, yet research often emphasizes behavioral adjustment and mental health symptoms over underlying identity processes. Becoming a mother is not only a role acquisition; it can involve reorganization of self-concept, values, competencies, and perceived continuity of the self across time. These identity shifts may, in turn, shape maternal well-being and the emerging mother–infant relationship during a sensitive developmental window.

In the MRI-funded project Lost and Found: A Mixed-Methods Examination of Identity in New Motherhood and Its Relation to the Developing Mother–Child Relationship, Chelsea Cortright (Lehigh University) investigates how identity development in the perinatal period relates to maternal psychological adjustment and early relational quality. The study brings identity theory into conversation with attachment and perinatal mental health research, advancing a process-oriented account of how mothers navigate internal change while forming new bonds.

The project is grounded in Berzonsky’s Identity Style Theory, which conceptualizes identity development in terms of characteristic information-processing styles. Individuals with an information-oriented style actively seek, evaluate, and integrate identity-relevant information; those with a norm-oriented style rely heavily on external expectations and social prescriptions; and those with a diffuse-avoidant style tend to postpone identity exploration until situational pressures demand engagement. Applying this framework to the perinatal transition allows examination of how mothers process the demands and expectations associated with motherhood—and whether certain styles predict more adaptive identity integration and relational outcomes.

The study employs a mixed-methods, longitudinal design. Quantitatively, 200 first-time pregnant participants are assessed during pregnancy and again approximately four months postpartum. Prenatal identity styles are examined as predictors of a postpartum “positive identity” profile encompassing self-esteem, self-concept clarity, general self-efficacy, and maternal self-efficacy. These identity indicators are then linked to measures of maternal mental health (e.g., depressive and anxiety symptoms) and mother–infant relationship quality, allowing for modeling of potential pathways from identity processing to relational functioning.

Qualitatively, a subset of 30 participants completes in-depth interviews both prenatally and postpartum. These interviews explore the lived experience of identity change: expectations entering motherhood, perceived losses and gains, sources of validation or self-doubt, and how mothers interpret their own competence. Particular attention is given to the role of intensive mothering beliefs—culturally reinforced ideals emphasizing self-sacrifice, constant attunement, and high performance. The study examines whether internalization of these ideals supports identity coherence or contributes to strain, especially when lived experiences diverge from expectations.

The integration of quantitative modeling with narrative analysis allows the research team to move beyond static measures of adjustment. Identity development is conceptualized as dynamic and interpretive—shaped by meaning-making processes that influence how mothers experience and enact caregiving. This design enables examination of whether adaptive identity processing during pregnancy predicts not only maternal well-being, but also relational confidence and responsiveness in early interactions with infants.

The translational implications are notable. If certain identity styles or belief systems confer risk for poorer maternal adjustment or strained bonding, early perinatal interventions could incorporate identity-focused reflection alongside traditional mood screening. Supporting mothers in integrating pre-existing aspects of self with emerging maternal roles may strengthen both psychological well-being and relational security during infancy.

By situating new motherhood within a developmental identity framework, this project reframes the transition as more than adjustment to caregiving tasks. It positions identity integration as a central mechanism through which maternal well-being and early mother–child relationships are shaped—offering a nuanced, theory-driven pathway for supporting families at the start of life together

Sophie Suberville